Democracy In Action: Election Day In Fitchburg
Michael Burns – Managing Editor of The Point
On election day in downtown Fitchburg, the air was charged with the energy of civic engagement. As voters trickled into polling locations, State Representative Michael Kushmerek and Ward 4 City Councilor Andy Van Hazinga stood at the corner of Wallace Avenue in front of Monument Park and the Fitchburg Public Library, they held signs supporting incumbent Senator John Cronin for State Senate, making time to discuss the significance of their presence and the importance of local politics.
“We’re here supporting democracy,” said Kushmerek. “It’s about backing a candidate in a close race. Senator John Cronin is not only a legislative colleague but also a close friend. He’s been a fantastic partner for the city of Fitchburg, making impactful strides alongside us.” Van Hazinga echoed the sentiment, emphasizing how Cronin’s dedication has helped drive the city forward. “We’ve been fortunate to have leadership that’s invested in aiding our city’s growth and success,” he added.
The state Senate race in topic is for the Worcester and Middlesex District with Democrat John Cronin facing off against Republican candidate Nicholas Pirro III. The District includes Fitchburg, Leominster, and several surrounding towns, the race has emerged as a significant battle locally over the future of the district, with each candidate presenting starkly different visions and priorities.
Senator John Cronin, seeking his third term, has built a reputation on logistical solutions and decisive action. He has prioritized economic revitalization in Fitchburg and Leominster, championing initiatives like the push for Vocational training for highschoolers, which has grown from $600,000 to $5 million in annual state funding under his advocacy. Cronin’s legislative work also extends to healthcare, where he fought to improve mental health services by shifting resources from emergency rooms to community-based centers. He also secured federal relief funding for Leominster after the floods in 2023, which some use to point to as his ability to collaborate with the Healey administration for long-term solutions. Despite questions raised about his campaign expenditures, Cronin has defended his actions as transparent and focused on the community’s best interests.
In contrast, Nicholas Pirro III brings a background as a business owner to his candidacy, focusing on what he sees as rampant government spending and the need for fiscal responsibility. His campaign emphasizes amending the state’s right-to-shelter that brought migrants to the area to be housed. Instead wanting to prioritize Massachusetts residents and reduce “burdensome mandates” that impact small businesses. While Pirro’s past includes legal disputes and allegations tied to his towing company, he insists these experiences have shaped his understanding of the challenges faced by local entrepreneurs. He has also voiced concern over the loss of healthcare services in the region, criticizing the state administration for failing to preserve Nashoba Valley Medical Center.
Representative Kushmerek and Councilor Van Hazinga both highlighted the critical need for proactive and effective leadership.
With the divisive nature of politics hanging heavily in the background, and when asked how significant it is for people to remain engaged, especially in local elections, Kushmerek responded, “It’s everything. The folks on this ballot, from the president down to state and local officials, are people who share your daily experiences. Your ward councilor, your mayor, your state rep, and your senator; these are the closest links you have to political decision-making.”
He continued, “You’ll never get closer to politics and never get closer to the decision-making than at those positions. Your ward councilor has to live in the same geographic part of the city as you . . . It is that teamwork of all of us working together, working to execute on the same vision for the city.”
Van Hazinga reciprocated, emphasizing the tangible impact of local government. “All politics are local,” he said. “The progress we make as a city comes down to having a strong team from ward councilors up to the state level. It’s about ensuring we have the resources and a solid plan to keep growing and thriving.”
As both stood across the street from the Fitchburg Public Library, a site of ongoing redevelopment, and in front of Monument Park, established by the city in 1874 and dedicated to Fitchburg’s American Civil War veterans. A fitting and symbolic location to find two local representatives. The location serving as a testament to the city’s long-standing commitment to service and civic duty, while also symbolizing the ongoing efforts by local government to support and uplift the community.
Before wrapping up, I asked them to reflect on what electing the first female president would mean. Kushmerek, a new father, shared a heartfelt perspective. “I see everything through the lens of my son now,” he said. “A female president would signify that anything is possible in this country, regardless of gender or race. It’s about raising my son in a world that upholds those values of inclusion and opportunity.”
Van Hazinga highlighted the broader message of equity. “It’s crucial that we elect the best person for the job, regardless of gender. But having a female president would underscore that we’re moving forward, offering everyone a fair shot,” he said. “It’s a signal of progress, that our society is rooted in equal opportunity.”
Kushmerek laughed and gestured at Van Hazinga. “I’ll go with his answer”. It was encouraging to see local leaders echo valuable sentiments about the power of collaboration and the significance of grassroots involvement.
As citizens, neighbors, and the community cast their ballots, the city’s leaders are out there too, engaging in the democratic process. It’s an indicative reminder that every vote matters and impacts everyday life for all. It shows that positive change is tangible, and that every voice holds significance.